arXiv limits preprint submissions to two per month amid AI-driven surge

arXiv has capped submissions at two preprints per calendar month per submitter, with no more than three active submissions at any one time. The updated rate limit policy took effect on October 1, 2026. The repository calls it a stopgap while it works out best practice for AI-assisted authors and improves its moderation tools.

What the new limits mean

The limits apply to all submitters and all subject categories. Rejected submissions still count toward the monthly total, because the cap covers submissions rather than announced papers. Papers on hold from a previous month do not count against the next month's quota but do count toward the three active submissions, a ceiling in place since 2024. The limits apply only to the submitting author and not to co-authors, and a paper deleted before announcement counts against neither limit.

A record month

arXiv received 40,363 submissions in September 2026, a new single-month record, up from 20,569 in September 2024 and 9,869 in September 2016. The volume generated almost 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. Submissions in the cs.AI category grew more than sixfold over two years, while other categories doubled.

AI tools and next steps

arXiv says advanced AI tools are helping drive the increase by making some parts of research faster and easier. The repository allows AI as a research aid when its use is disclosed and the work meets its scholarly standards, but moderators report an increase in thin papers of narrow scope, "salami" papers that split one work into several smaller ones, and dense AI-written texts.

Thomas Dietterich, Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Oregon State University and chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council, said a small proportion of authors submit a large number of low-quality papers and consume a disproportionate fraction of moderators' time, delaying quality papers by days or weeks.

The limits follow a one-strike policy introduced in May 2026: authors whose papers show "incontrovertible evidence" of unchecked LLM-generated content, such as hallucinated references or leftover chatbot comments, face a one-year ban from arXiv and must have their next submission accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue first. arXiv says it will continue to monitor how the change affects authors, readers and its corpus, and adjust it as needed.