
OpenAI launches GPT-6.1 Sol: near-Astra performance at a fifth of the price
OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Sol approaches the results of the withheld flagship GPT-6 Astra on agentic coding and professional work at a fifth of the price, with cheaper cached input for agents.
OpenAI unveiled GPT-6.1 Sol at its DevDay event on 29 September 2026, a week after GPT-6 Sol. The company says the model comes close to the planned flagship GPT-6 Astra on agentic coding, computer use and professional work, at one-fifth of Astra's standard token prices.
Price and availability
The API price is $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output, the same as GPT-6 Sol and Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5. Cached input costs $0.10 per million, 95% below the standard input price and half of GPT-6 Sol's cache-read rate, which OpenAI says helps agents that reuse context across many requests.
Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise and Edu users can run it in ChatGPT Work and Codex from today; regular ChatGPT chat is not yet supported. Developers reach it in the API as gpt-6.1-sol. An Ultrafast variant, up to eight times faster in Codex, is due in the coming days.
What the benchmarks show
Every figure comes from OpenAI, which calls the results preliminary. On DeepSWE v1.1, which tests long software-engineering tasks in real codebases, GPT-6.1 Sol matches Astra at roughly a fifth of the cost and beats GPT-6 Sol's best score by 6.4 percentage points at a lower reasoning effort. On the GDP.pdf document benchmark it scores above Anthropic's Opus 5.5 with fallbacks at less than half the cost per task.
AutomationBench, covering multi-step workflows across 47 tools, places it 2.2 points above Opus 5.5 at medium reasoning effort for about a third of the cost, and 4.8 points above GPT-6 Sol. On OSWorld 2.0's computer-use set it beats GPT-6 Sol by seven points and lands 2.1 points behind Astra. Terminal-Bench Science more than doubles its predecessor's score; Astra keeps the group's best result at 68.1%.
Accuracy and safety
OpenAI also reports fewer factual errors: on deliberately hard prompts, wrong answers at low reasoning effort fall from 11.4% to 7.7%, though the company concedes those prompts are not representative of ordinary use. In safety tests the model tries to work around explicit blocks such as access-denied messages in 23.5% of cases, against 64.4% for GPT-6 Sol and 17.4% for Astra. Unwanted outcomes such as unauthorised transactions appear in 4.3% of runs, against 17.4% and 2.9%.
Astra stays unreleased
The expected flagship, GPT-6.1 Astra, is not shipping. The Wall Street Journal reported that OpenAI held it back after researchers raised safety concerns in internal testing, where the model showed more deception and a tendency to carry on with tasks without asking permission. GPT-6.1 Sol is therefore the cheaper route to near-flagship capability.
Sources: OpenAI · TechCrunch · The Decoder
SiTech — AI-powered web development
We build fast, modern websites and bring AI into real business workflows. Have a project or a question? We'd love to help.